What is checked
Four things per entry, in this order. Each one is a fact that can be repeated by a reader who does not trust this site, which is the standard that decided the list.
- The licensing bodyNamed in full rather than summarised as "licensed". Three bodies and formats appear in this catalogue and they are not interchangeable.
- The register numberPrinted so it can be looked up. This is the single most useful line in any entry, and it takes about two minutes to verify.
- The settlement assetsRead from the cashier or the terms. Where the list was not read, the entry says "not read" instead of printing a figure.
- The verification wordingQuoted from the operator's terms rather than paraphrased into something friendlier or stricter than it is.
Three registers, checked separately
The Curaçao Gaming Authority issues numbers in an OGL format and keeps a register searched by that number. The Anjouan Gaming Board issues ALSI numbers in its own register. And one entry here carries an older Curaçao licence predating the numbered register, which is a different kind of record and is named as one.
| Operator | Body | Number | Holder named in the register |
|---|---|---|---|
| CryptoGames | Curaçao | OGL/2024/1336/1047 | MuchGaming B.V. |
| Wolf.bet | Anjouan | ALSI-132405048-FI3 | Cipher Games Ltd |
| Rocketpot | Curaçao | 1668/JAZ | Danneskjold Ventures B.V. |
| Wild Fortune | Anjouan | ALSI-202509073-FI2 | Metlait SRL |
| Rainbet | Anjouan | ALSI-152406029-FI2 | RBGAMING N.V. |
| Shuffle | Curaçao | OGL/2024/1337/0628 | Natural Nine B.V. |
| CoinPoker | Anjouan | ALSI-202412004-FI1 | PRECISE INTERACTIVE INC |
| Bitcasino.io | Curaçao | OGL/2023/111/0069 | Moon Technologies B.V. |
The holder column is the one people skip. A register entry names a company, and if that company is not the one the site's terms name, that gap is the finding.
What is deliberately absent
Printed here
- The licensing body and the register number.
- The company named as holder.
- Settlement assets, where the cashier states them.
- Verification wording, quoted.
- Search volumes, labelled with their source.
Absent, and why
- Ratings — every entry opens the same door.
- Payout times — nobody here timed a withdrawal.
- RTP figures — no citable source, no number.
- Bonus headlines — stale within weeks.
- Predictors and systems — none exist.
Every one of those omissions costs something. A rating would make the catalogue easier to skim; a payout time would answer the question people ask most. The alternative is printing a number nobody measured, which is what the rest of this market does and what this site is built to avoid.
The working exchange rate
Operators state thresholds and minimums in dollars, euros or coin. Where this site converts one for orientation it uses a working rate of about R 18 to the dollar and says so at the point of use — a $2,500 threshold becomes roughly R 45 000.
That is a working figure for reading terms, not a quote and not a prediction. The figure the operator enforces is the one in its own currency, and a coin-denominated threshold moves with the coin's price rather than staying put.
How to test this page
Take any entry in the catalogue, copy the register number, and search the body's own register for it. If it resolves and names the holder printed here, that is one entry verified in about two minutes. If it does not, this site has made an error and would like to hear about it — see about this site.
That is the whole invitation, and it is the reason the numbers are printed in the first place. A claim you can test is worth more than a claim dressed up as a score.
Questions people actually ask
Why no ratings?
Because every entry opens the same door. A ranking with one destination is decoration, and a score with no stated inputs is a number someone chose.
How is this site paid for?
Through the link that every entry uses. That arrangement is stated here rather than implied, and it is the reason nothing on the site is ranked.
What happens if a licence disappears from a register?
The entry is removed. There is nothing to demote it to, because there is no ranking.