- Licensing body
- Curaçao Gaming Authority
- Register number
- OGL/2023/111/0069
- Status as read
- Active
- Holder named in the register
- Moon Technologies B.V.
- Game types
- slots, live dealer, originals, sportsbook
- Verification, per the terms
- Verification may be requested at any time, including on the first deposit, and the terms name a withdrawal size above which it is expected.
- Payout speed
- not published here — none was timed
- Rating
- none, and none is planned
Every row above was read in a register or in the operator's own terms. The last two rows are what this site refuses to invent.
A 2023 number among 2024 and 2025 ones
The register entry here is the earliest in this catalogue, issued under the Curaçao Gaming Authority a year before most of the others. The site itself predates that entry by years, which is normal rather than suspicious: the numbered register is recent, and an established operator appearing with a recent number is what the transition looked like for everyone.
What the number provides is a way to check today's position rather than a history. Longevity is a separate piece of information — a site operating for years has a record that can be looked into — and this catalogue keeps the two apart instead of blending them into a score.
What this page does not know
The fact sheet above has a gap: the settlement assets were not read, so no number is printed. That gap is stated rather than filled, and it is worth explaining why, because filling it would have been easy and wrong.
What was checked here
- The licence, in the issuing body's register.
- The company named as holder.
- The verification wording, from the terms.
- The stated withdrawal threshold in those terms.
What was not
- The cashier's asset list.
- Any payout time, here or anywhere on this site.
- Return-to-player figures for any title.
A reader who needs the asset list can read it in the cashier before depositing, which takes a minute and is authoritative in a way a third-party number never is. How each one is checked explains the rule that produces this blank rather than a guess.
A stated threshold, in euros
The terms name a withdrawal size above which verification is expected, quoted in euros rather than dollars. Converted roughly for orientation at the working rate this site uses, a €2,500 threshold lands in the region of R 47 500 — a working figure for reading terms, not a quote, and one that moves with the currency pair rather than staying put.
As with Rocketpot, the value of a stated figure is that it converts an open-ended discretion into something a player can plan around. It does not stop the operator asking below it.
What a long record is worth, and what it is not
Longevity is genuine information. A site that has been operating for years has a record that can be looked into, a history of how it handled things, and a name that existed before the current marketing. None of that is a safety rating, and this catalogue will not convert it into one.
What it does change is the kind of question worth asking. For a new operator the useful question is whether the licence resolves today. For an old one it is whether anything about the operation has changed hands — which is why the holder column on the method page exists, and why a register entry naming a different company from the site's own terms is a finding rather than a formality.
Where this page stops
These carry on from here: CryptoGames, Wolf.bet, Eight sites, with the register number attached.
Questions people actually ask
Why does the asset count say "not read"?
Because it was not read. This site prints numbers it has seen and says so when it has not, rather than copying a figure from somewhere else and presenting it as checked.
Does an older site mean a safer one?
It means a longer record, which is information. It is not a guarantee, and this catalogue does not convert it into one.