- Licensing body
- Anjouan Gaming Board
- Register number
- ALSI-202509073-FI2
- Status as read
- valid
- Holder named in the register
- Metlait SRL
- Settlement assets
- 10
- Game types
- slots, live dealer, tables
- Verification, per the terms
- Verification may be requested at the operator's discretion, and in one stated case documents are required before play rather than after it.
- Payout speed
- not published here — none was timed
- Rating
- none, and none is planned
Every row above was read in a register or in the operator's own terms. The last two rows are what this site refuses to invent.
One site, two verification experiences
The interesting thing about this entry is not how strict it is but how unevenly the strictness is applied. The terms reserve the ordinary discretion to ask for documents at any time, and then name a case where documents are required before play rather than after it — depending on the asset deposited.
That matters for a South African specifically, because the asset you arrive holding is usually decided by the exchange rather than by you: whatever was cheapest to buy against rand at that moment. A rule that changes with the coin turns a pricing decision on Luno or VALR into a verification decision at the casino, which is not a connection anyone makes in advance.
What is stated
- Documents may be requested at the operator's discretion.
- In one named case, identity is required before play.
- Deposits and bets are blocked until that is satisfied.
What is not stated
- A figure above which a check becomes expected.
- How long a check takes, which nobody publishes usefully.
- Anything this site has measured, because it measured none of it.
Ten assets and an ordinary catalogue
Ten settlement assets is mid-range here and covers the common cases. The game catalogue is the most common shape in this list — slots, live dealer and tables licensed from the studios that supply nearly everyone — which means the question "which site has better games" resolves, as usual, to "which interface do you prefer".
That is worth stating plainly rather than padding. Where a catalogue is ordinary, saying so is more useful than finding adjectives for it, and it moves the decision back to the two things that genuinely differ: the cashier and the terms.
Reading a discretionary clause without guessing
Three questions get you most of the way through any verification section, and they work on every entry in this catalogue rather than just this one.
- When is the earliest point documents can be required? Before deposit, before withdrawal, or at any time — each produces a different first session.
- Is any figure named? A stated threshold is a fact; a discretion is a power.
- Does anything about the deposit method change the answer? On this entry it does, which is why the question is on the list at all.
Where this page stops
These carry on from here: Rainbet, Shuffle, Eight sites, with the register number attached.
Questions people actually ask
What does an asset-dependent rule look like in practice?
The terms name one deposit asset where identity documents are required before play, while other assets follow the ordinary discretionary rule. Same site, two experiences.
Does that make it stricter or looser than the others?
Neither, evenly. It is stricter for one route in and ordinary for the rest, which is why this page prints the wording instead of a label.
Read next